Blaze wrote: ↑Thu Aug 08, 2024 11:05 am
exile wrote: ↑Thu Aug 08, 2024 10:52 am
I thought the IBF had done a blood test and identified XY chromosomes. I am no expert in this but is that not conclusive?
They have but it is strongly contested by the IOC :
PARIS (AP) — Olympics organizers said Sunday (4 Aug 2024) that arbitrary testing imposed on boxers Imane Khelif and Lin Yu-Ting that led to a storm of vitriol misidentifying the women as transgender or men was “so flawed that it’s impossible to engage with it.”
International Olympic Committee spokesman Mark Adams again vigorously defended Khelif of Algeria and Lin of Taiwan, hammering the sport’s now-banned governing body, the International Boxing Association, that claimed the fighters failed unspecified eligibility tests for women’s competition.
Yes I saw the IOC statement that leaves open a whole host of questions.
Are they concerned about the "arbitrary" selection of people to be tested? Perhaps all athletes should be tested at extreme cost of course.
And the testing was flawed in what way? The way the samples were taken? The test performed? Someone mentioned the tests being done overnight as a reason to not believe them. Really?? If that is the basis to reject tests most drunk drivers should appeal.
It is, to use their phrase, a deeply flawed statement that on its own does not stand up to scrutiny and offers no substantive explanation as to why the bans should not apply.
The IOC decision to apply testosterone levels to determine sex and eligibility flies in the face of science which has established chromosomes as a determinant - and arguably a much more reliable one.
Testosterone is found in both men and women. The levels are usually but not always higher in men. It is possible to supress testosterone levels - spironolactone is frequently used. A testosterone test - even when taken as a sequence over time - must leave a level of doubt.
AFAIAA there is no way to bu@@er around with the presence or not of the Y chromosome.